Welcome to Club SAITO !
My Feedback: (2)
Hi guys,
I'm pretty certain that Santa is going to leave a Saito .72B under the tree for me. I've had larger and smaller Saitos but never a .72. I plan on mounting it inverted in a H9 J-3 Cub. Is there anything that I should know about it?? I'm planning on using 10% fuel so I think perhaps a 13x6 prop, maybe??. Who has experience with the .72 that they'd like to pass along.
Thanks,
Bob
I'm pretty certain that Santa is going to leave a Saito .72B under the tree for me. I've had larger and smaller Saitos but never a .72. I plan on mounting it inverted in a H9 J-3 Cub. Is there anything that I should know about it?? I'm planning on using 10% fuel so I think perhaps a 13x6 prop, maybe??. Who has experience with the .72 that they'd like to pass along.
Thanks,
Bob
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: fitchburg,
MA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run a 13x 6 on a cub
14x4 on a profile 3d
10% wildcat fuel
rule of thumb I've followed
for an inch of diameter change pitch 2"
turns both at just about 10k
plenty of power
14x4 on a profile 3d
10% wildcat fuel
rule of thumb I've followed
for an inch of diameter change pitch 2"
turns both at just about 10k
plenty of power
My Feedback: (102)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
Bob, the B is the new crankcase style like picture #1, picture #2 is the old style. In the case of the .72b, it also has a metal back plate.
Last edited by Hobbsy; 12-07-2014 at 05:31 AM. Reason: Coorect spelling
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
hsukaria, not sure if anyone answered your question on the 91 prop recommendation, but for ground clearance I run MA 13/8 3-blades on both the 91 and 100 to good effect. For scale and to clear the large cowl, the second 91 in the AT-6 on the build table now will start with a JZ Zinger 14/8 wood prop, (my normal procedure is to start with wood till familiar with ground handling and landing) and likely then get an MA of identical specs.
To be honest other than those mentioned I have only run Graupners. Although they seem to look nice, their performance seems identical or lower than MA. Have not yet bolted APC to any 4-strokes. Look too far from scale for my eye.
To be honest other than those mentioned I have only run Graupners. Although they seem to look nice, their performance seems identical or lower than MA. Have not yet bolted APC to any 4-strokes. Look too far from scale for my eye.
My Feedback: (9)
The last few flights with my Saito FG-33R3 have ended with dead sticks. Engine starts and runs fine, but after a few minutes of flight, temp climbs (on-board telemetry) and ultimately engine dies. After playing with various baffle systems, I decided to reset needles to closed position and start from factory settings. At this point, I realized that the low speed needle [referred to as "slow speed needle" in manual] was super lean! Manual states 8 turns from closed, and needle was 6 - yikes! It is evidently moving/vibrating while running.
What causes this and more importantly, what is the solution? Engine has less than 1 gallon of fuel.
Thanks for your guidance!
Cheers
What causes this and more importantly, what is the solution? Engine has less than 1 gallon of fuel.
Thanks for your guidance!
Cheers
Last edited by marksp; 12-08-2014 at 10:12 PM.
Merry Christmas to You and Yours.
Sincerely, Richard
Cub Brotherhood #187; Sig 1/4, H9 100 inch (Gen 1), GB Anniv Cub
Club Saito #635; Saito 56, 100, 120abc, 130T, 180
Kadet Brotherhood #96; Mk 1 Kadet, Kadet Junior,
Sig Kougar, Sig 1/4 Cub, Sig 1/4 Spacewalker II
My Feedback: (2)
Thanks, Hobbsy. I can see the differences. Other than the backplate, I wonder why they felt the need to redesign the case? Thanks again for the information,
Bob
Bob
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Deer Park,
TX
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I bought my first Saito tonight but I messed up, or at least I'm pretty sure I messed up. It's a fa-62aCL. Can this be used in an rc plane, will a carb change be need?
Last edited by Rock81; 12-07-2014 at 07:58 PM.
Yes you can use it in a RC plane. But without a throttle, means you will fly it full throttle though. You can setup a engine shut off device either as a fuel shutoff to kill the engine on command. But for RC with a throttle, you will need a carburetor for it. That may require a intake manifold too.
My Feedback: (102)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
Bob, I've never seen a reason given for the change, maybe just a cleaner looking product. I saw where someone mentioned that the box might be stronger and more stable.
Richard, w8ye or SRTelemaster might know if your inner parts will slip right into the B case. I don't see why they wouldn't. I have three converted to CDI right now. A high compression .80, a 1.00 and a high compression 1.50. I don't know if they have more power yet, but it is safer to run them leaner. Adrian at C&H Ignition will steer you in the right direction.
PS, Richard, do you ever get down this way these days. I'd like to meet you in Fredericksburg at Shoney,s and treat you to lunch.
Richard, w8ye or SRTelemaster might know if your inner parts will slip right into the B case. I don't see why they wouldn't. I have three converted to CDI right now. A high compression .80, a 1.00 and a high compression 1.50. I don't know if they have more power yet, but it is safer to run them leaner. Adrian at C&H Ignition will steer you in the right direction.
PS, Richard, do you ever get down this way these days. I'd like to meet you in Fredericksburg at Shoney,s and treat you to lunch.
Last edited by Hobbsy; 12-08-2014 at 05:03 AM.
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Deer Park,
TX
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes you can use it in a RC plane. But without a throttle, means you will fly it full throttle though. You can setup a engine shut off device either as a fuel shutoff to kill the engine on command. But for RC with a throttle, you will need a carburetor for it. That may require a intake manifold too.
Senior Member
Generally, the only difference in "A" & "B" engines is the case, cylinder & the cam housing. The cylinders will interchange on either case & only differ as far as cooling fins with the "B" having more fin area. this is most likely so the casting can be used for FG versions that neeed the extra cooling.There are no geomtry differences between the "A" & "B" cylinders. The only parts that are exclusive to each other are the case & cam housing. All other parts interchange.
With big blocks I know this is true & a quick check of the 72 part #s seems to indicate the same.
With big blocks I know this is true & a quick check of the 72 part #s seems to indicate the same.
hsukaria, not sure if anyone answered your question on the 91 prop recommendation, but for ground clearance I run MA 13/8 3-blades on both the 91 and 100 to good effect. For scale and to clear the large cowl, the second 91 in the AT-6 on the build table now will start with a JZ Zinger 14/8 wood prop, (my normal procedure is to start with wood till familiar with ground handling and landing) and likely then get an MA of identical specs.
To be honest other than those mentioned I have only run Graupners. Although they seem to look nice, their performance seems identical or lower than MA. Have not yet bolted APC to any 4-strokes. Look too far from scale for my eye.
To be honest other than those mentioned I have only run Graupners. Although they seem to look nice, their performance seems identical or lower than MA. Have not yet bolted APC to any 4-strokes. Look too far from scale for my eye.
My Feedback: (3)
The 72 is a great engine. The APC 13x6 is perfect made for it. Wait until you hear it at full throttle after about a half a gallon of fuel. It is the best sounding Saito at wide open throttle, imo.
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The very best to you and yours.
Sincerely, Richard
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys,
I also have a almost new Saito 72. Couple of questions - where is a good place to get an ALUMINUM replacement throttle arm? I hate the plastic one.
Also - will I have any issues if I put in a remote high end needle valve? Where is a good place to get both items along with nipples and parts if I need them?
Thanks
Keith
I also have a almost new Saito 72. Couple of questions - where is a good place to get an ALUMINUM replacement throttle arm? I hate the plastic one.
Also - will I have any issues if I put in a remote high end needle valve? Where is a good place to get both items along with nipples and parts if I need them?
Thanks
Keith
My Feedback: (102)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
The metal arm will be hard to come by since it's the early style. If you can get hold of an MDS remote needle it would be ideal, they don't leak and will stand the pressure of a Cline regulator system. Since fuel can neither be stretched nor compressed it doesn't matter where you place it.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Generally, the only difference in "A" & "B" engines is the case, cylinder & the cam housing. The cylinders will interchange on either case & only differ as far as cooling fins with the "B" having more fin area. this is most likely so the casting can be used for FG versions that neeed the extra cooling.There are no geometry differences between the "A" & "B" cylinders. The only parts that are exclusive to each other are the case & cam housing. All other parts interchange.
The case vent was also moved from the back cover to below and opposite the cam, presumably for better lube and scavenge. On my first 91 I tapped the fitting into the case in that location and plugged the rear cover. Did not notice any difference in performance or parts life. However, since that motor spent the following 45 or more hours after that mod at predominantly half throttle, difficult to tell if the design came into its own.
I do not think this would prevent the newer parts fitting earlier gen motors.
Corsair 2013, The older arms were steel, not alloy. If you can measure the bore size or if someone can confirm the compatibility, I think I have one from an 82-91 that we can trade. I prefer the plastic anyway as the added thickness makes tapping for ball links a bit easier.
Last edited by Cougar429; 12-09-2014 at 05:38 AM.
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Deer Park,
TX
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Generally, the only difference in "A" & "B" engines is the case, cylinder & the cam housing. The cylinders will interchange on either case & only differ as far as cooling fins with the "B" having more fin area. this is most likely so the casting can be used for FG versions that neeed the extra cooling.There are no geomtry differences between the "A" & "B" cylinders. The only parts that are exclusive to each other are the case & cam housing. All other parts interchange.
With big blocks I know this is true & a quick check of the 72 part #s seems to indicate the same.
With big blocks I know this is true & a quick check of the 72 part #s seems to indicate the same.
Thank you, I was able to do some research to discover the a and b use the same carb and a, b, and aCL all use the same manifold. So I'm in business, it's going on an escapade. Can't wait.
I have owned the Escapade 40 for about 6 years now, great plane. I recently have been using it as a flying test platform. I have used 5 engines so far with a sixth one in the works. I have also used it to test radio receivers. I think the Saito 72 would be excellent on that plane. I recomment that you add triangle stock at the firewall and a crossbrace between the cowl cheeks. They vibrate a lot and will crack the glue joint.