To the old salts...
#1
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
... who hang out here, helping newbies... please forgive the length of this inquiry, but you'll see why. I posted this query in the newbie/beginner forum because the veterans here will be most up-to-speed on the topic of viable trainer models.
I'm in somewhat of a dilemma. Grandson #2 is showing interest in the hobby, is getting pretty good on the sim, and is about ready to start actually flying. So, being the good modeler/grand dad, I bought him a plane. After much thought and looking around, I got the H9 P-51 PTS; the original yellow-tail example. Just bought the airframe, since I have tons of everything else (engines, radio gear, etc.). We'll be buddy-boxing, so I figured we didn't need a conventional trainer.
Well... I assembled it, and am not terribly impressed with its flying qualities. Oh, it flies okay, but needs a lot of rudder in slow-speed turns and is a pig in general at low speed- with OR without the droops. It has a strong O.S. 46SF for power; I triple-checked the balance and incidents, etc., and it is within proper weight parameters. I even tried different props. But for whatever reason, it won't be the optimum thing for him to learn to land with. So we'll put that one back on the wall for his "second plane".
Now comes the dilemma; i.e., what trainer to get? I've got an LT40 kit NIB, but don't have the time to build it quickly. The ARF version (which I had, until grandson #1 and I killed it playing around on a VERY windy day; a GREAT trainer, IMO) has been AWOL for quite some time, I'm told, even though Sig is supposedly re-organizing. Ah, I say to myself... I know, I'll get an Eagle ARF. Then I find out that The Empire now owns what is left of Goldberg, and the Eagle 63 ARF is "temporarily unavailable"... which is Empire-speak for "We're getting ready to dump it".
So I go to the LHS and check out the various Empire trainers; Hobbico AviStar, NexStar, Tower Trainer, etc. Not impressed with any of those (nor the few "off-brand/economy" offerings), either, for various reasons.
So, here's the question: What else is out there? The new offering of the TameCat looks intriguing, but I'm betting its squirrelly on the ground; and everybody seems to be out of stock, anyway.
Have I missed anything? All I want is a simple high D-tube wing and box fuselage, that is light enough to fly on an old O.S. 40FP. I'll make a taildragger out of it, and as soon as the kid is competent with it he can try his P-51 again. Wish I had the time to build that LT40, but that just isn't in the cards now. I need SOMETHING, before the kid loses interest.
Help me out here, guys... I've run slap out of options.
.
I'm in somewhat of a dilemma. Grandson #2 is showing interest in the hobby, is getting pretty good on the sim, and is about ready to start actually flying. So, being the good modeler/grand dad, I bought him a plane. After much thought and looking around, I got the H9 P-51 PTS; the original yellow-tail example. Just bought the airframe, since I have tons of everything else (engines, radio gear, etc.). We'll be buddy-boxing, so I figured we didn't need a conventional trainer.
Well... I assembled it, and am not terribly impressed with its flying qualities. Oh, it flies okay, but needs a lot of rudder in slow-speed turns and is a pig in general at low speed- with OR without the droops. It has a strong O.S. 46SF for power; I triple-checked the balance and incidents, etc., and it is within proper weight parameters. I even tried different props. But for whatever reason, it won't be the optimum thing for him to learn to land with. So we'll put that one back on the wall for his "second plane".
Now comes the dilemma; i.e., what trainer to get? I've got an LT40 kit NIB, but don't have the time to build it quickly. The ARF version (which I had, until grandson #1 and I killed it playing around on a VERY windy day; a GREAT trainer, IMO) has been AWOL for quite some time, I'm told, even though Sig is supposedly re-organizing. Ah, I say to myself... I know, I'll get an Eagle ARF. Then I find out that The Empire now owns what is left of Goldberg, and the Eagle 63 ARF is "temporarily unavailable"... which is Empire-speak for "We're getting ready to dump it".
So I go to the LHS and check out the various Empire trainers; Hobbico AviStar, NexStar, Tower Trainer, etc. Not impressed with any of those (nor the few "off-brand/economy" offerings), either, for various reasons.
So, here's the question: What else is out there? The new offering of the TameCat looks intriguing, but I'm betting its squirrelly on the ground; and everybody seems to be out of stock, anyway.
Have I missed anything? All I want is a simple high D-tube wing and box fuselage, that is light enough to fly on an old O.S. 40FP. I'll make a taildragger out of it, and as soon as the kid is competent with it he can try his P-51 again. Wish I had the time to build that LT40, but that just isn't in the cards now. I need SOMETHING, before the kid loses interest.
Help me out here, guys... I've run slap out of options.
.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here's one I reviewed a while back. The price has gone up since the review, but it's a great plane that I still keep around for training:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/a...rticle_id=1108
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/a...rticle_id=1108
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hobby Lobby has recently released ARF upgrades to their classic Telemaster 40 and Funster. They are available. Check the HL website.
Telemaster is a very stable trainer. Easy to fly slowly for a beginner to have time to react. Also they are about the smoothest landers around.
The Funster is a low wing version. Lots of people want it as a second plane to learn some aerobatics while still keeping that slow flight and slow landing. Some folks choose it as a primary trainer.
There are tons of trainers out there. These are among the very best.
Tom
Telemaster is a very stable trainer. Easy to fly slowly for a beginner to have time to react. Also they are about the smoothest landers around.
The Funster is a low wing version. Lots of people want it as a second plane to learn some aerobatics while still keeping that slow flight and slow landing. Some folks choose it as a primary trainer.
There are tons of trainers out there. These are among the very best.
Tom
#4
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you're flying the Mustang PTS with the 3 bladed prop...get a two blade APC...take off the speed brakes, raise the flaps and go teach him.....I'm no fan of any of the PTS's...but since you have it use it.......
The best option you have is to get someone to build that LT-40 for you.....
Good Luck
The best option you have is to get someone to build that LT-40 for you.....
Good Luck
#5
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ibid on the 2 blade prop on the PTS
As came up recently in the Beginner's area...
Since you WILL be buddy boxing with him, consider something like a Big Stik.
Tone down the throws and you have a very nice docile plane.
Later you can dial things back up and let him have a blast doing aerobatics.
The plane is trivially easy to repair as well.
As came up recently in the Beginner's area...
Since you WILL be buddy boxing with him, consider something like a Big Stik.
Tone down the throws and you have a very nice docile plane.
Later you can dial things back up and let him have a blast doing aerobatics.
The plane is trivially easy to repair as well.
#6
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
My Feedback: (1)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: MinnFlyer
Here's one I reviewed a while back. The price has gone up since the review, but it's a great plane that I still keep around for training:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/a...rticle_id=1108
Here's one I reviewed a while back. The price has gone up since the review, but it's a great plane that I still keep around for training:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/a...rticle_id=1108
Since I am not a big fan of the PTS, I'd vote for that one.
If the OP wants a dihedral trainer, well, the Tower 40 ARF is also a good deal and a great trainer. However, the Wingman I would give something, that after it's role as a trainer, could be given a bit more aileron/elevator and made to perform a lot better, more like a good second plane.
CGr.
#8
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: jetmech05
If you're flying the Mustang PTS with the 3 bladed prop...get a two blade APC...take off the speed brakes, raise the flaps and go teach him.....
If you're flying the Mustang PTS with the 3 bladed prop...get a two blade APC...take off the speed brakes, raise the flaps and go teach him.....
Its still a pig below half throttle.
.
#9
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: opjose
Since you WILL be buddy boxing with him, consider something like a Big Stik.
Tone down the throws and you have a very nice docile plane.
Since you WILL be buddy boxing with him, consider something like a Big Stik.
Tone down the throws and you have a very nice docile plane.
Many thanks for all the ideas. Keep them coming if something else comes to mind...
.
#11
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (-1)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm sure not a fan of the PTS system but I did like the 51 after I got rid of the slowumdown crap, just not as a trainer. After reading Mikes review and looking at the plane I sure like the looks of that one. The price {then }sure wasn't out of line either. I wouldn't mind having one of them set up and ready to go in my hanger!!
#12
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
My Feedback: (1)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: MinnFlyer
Yes, flying it was very similar to the Midwest Aerobat
Yes, flying it was very similar to the Midwest Aerobat
The shape of the wing saddle, where the wing "slotted" into the fuselage is where the problem is. And, when it flipped over, the tail feathers broke completely off.. it was really slammed down hard.
Jeez.. now that I look at their web site, the Wingman II is a pretty neat looking plane too!!!
Hmmmm.. when you go to the "buy one" page, the price goes from $99.99 to $109.00. What's with that?
CGr.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sambach,
AE, GERMANY
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For me there is an easy answer to this question. The Tower hobbies Trainer is probably one of the best values on the market at $79+shipping. It is rugged and well built. It will be ahpy with just about any motor you put on the nose and it will take ALOT of abuse. Trust me I know. I used mine as a windy day flyer and plane for my buddies to fly on the buddy box. I beat it up pretty bad but it never once showed any signs of the neglect that were heaped upon it. Don't let the price fool you. It is well built and flies rock solid. My favorite part of the Tower Trainer is that you don't have to be worried about breaking it. If you crash it you are not out much money! I have never heard anyone who wasn't happy with it. Good luck with your Grandson!!
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXCAS2&P=ML
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXCAS2&P=ML
#16
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (11)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Why not look around and see the world is moving to electric? How about the apprentice? Nice electric RTF plane and crashes are usually a simple glue job.
I have flown the electric Nextstar, but would not recommend it. If you do go that route, make sure you use both droops and speed brakes together.
I prefer an outrunner/lipo setup... and the Alpha 40 is a great little plane for that but they are currently out of stock.
Just getting into the hobby, means going with some current technology... the slime'r is not always the first choice.
I have flown the electric Nextstar, but would not recommend it. If you do go that route, make sure you use both droops and speed brakes together.
I prefer an outrunner/lipo setup... and the Alpha 40 is a great little plane for that but they are currently out of stock.
Just getting into the hobby, means going with some current technology... the slime'r is not always the first choice.
#17
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: TruBlu02
The Tower hobbies Trainer is probably one of the best values on the market at $79+shipping. It is rugged and well built.
The Tower hobbies Trainer is probably one of the best values on the market at $79+shipping. It is rugged and well built.
There are some decent-looking trainers out there in web land, but one wonders just how much customer service is to be had from the vendors, if it should become necessary. If I buy this one from the LHS, he will handle any problems with the kit.
I have found ONE place that claims to have the Eagle ARF in stock. I'll call them in a bit here. If they don't have it, then I believe I'll go with this Tower Hobbies Special. The more I think about the Big Stik option, the more possible pitfalls come to mind.
Again, thanks to all.
.
#18
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: on_your_six
Why not look around and see the world is moving to electric?
Why not look around and see the world is moving to electric?
I have "been in the hobby" since 1987. Part of the fun for me is the noise and clatter of the engines. And I could not care less as to where "the world is moving to".
Enjoy your flying hair dryers; I'll enjoy my "slimers"...
.
#19
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[quote]ORIGINAL: LSP972
ORIGINAL: jetmech05
If you're flying the Mustang PTS with the 3 bladed prop...get a two blade APC...take off the speed brakes, raise the flaps and go teach him.....
If you're flying the Mustang PTS with the 3 bladed prop...get a two blade APC...take off the speed brakes, raise the flaps and go teach him.....
Its still a pig below half throttle.
.
[/quote
11X7.5 is not a good choice for a trainer. If you want to build up speed, I guess it could do that, but I think thrust is more what a trainer needs. Go toi 11X5 or 11X6 and see the improved performance.
#20
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills,
IL
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
19 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You were looking at the best and did not even relize it.
The Evil Empire's Hobbico Avistar is the finest youg people trainer ever. IMHO light wing loading and very stable.
I have one bashed to a bolt on wing, tail dragger, dual alieron servos and no cowl cheeks.
With wild throws it snaps, knife edges and handles everthing I can throw at it. But on low rates it is a perfect trainer. So the name in your Mustang's "PTS" (progressive trainer system) is truely manifested. Again IMHO.
This is the trainer I sugguest for all nonvision impared students. For slower and vision impared adluts I recomend the Empire's 60 size version the Hobbico Hobbistar.
good luck my grandson is 19 months so maybe someday for me too.
The Evil Empire's Hobbico Avistar is the finest youg people trainer ever. IMHO light wing loading and very stable.
I have one bashed to a bolt on wing, tail dragger, dual alieron servos and no cowl cheeks.
With wild throws it snaps, knife edges and handles everthing I can throw at it. But on low rates it is a perfect trainer. So the name in your Mustang's "PTS" (progressive trainer system) is truely manifested. Again IMHO.
This is the trainer I sugguest for all nonvision impared students. For slower and vision impared adluts I recomend the Empire's 60 size version the Hobbico Hobbistar.
good luck my grandson is 19 months so maybe someday for me too.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg, MB, CANADA
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I hope you are wrong about the Eagle, it is one of my favorites and my son is currently building the Eagle 2 kit. They do seem to be sweeping all things Goldberg off the market though.
I like the look of the Wingman but I watched one of the guys at our club learn on a Stik. It worked out well for him and he has been able to dial it up a notch as he has become more experienced. If you can't find an Eagle ARF my vote would be the Stik with the 91 on it.
I am not quite sure why you would go out and buy Lipos and a charger if you have everything you need for glow on hand.
I have nothing against electric flyers as I am a firm believer in each to their own. That being said, and to paraphrase the NRA, you can have my glow set ups when you pry them out of my cold dead fingers. I love the smell, the sound and even the clean up.
Cheers
Gord
I like the look of the Wingman but I watched one of the guys at our club learn on a Stik. It worked out well for him and he has been able to dial it up a notch as he has become more experienced. If you can't find an Eagle ARF my vote would be the Stik with the 91 on it.
I am not quite sure why you would go out and buy Lipos and a charger if you have everything you need for glow on hand.
I have nothing against electric flyers as I am a firm believer in each to their own. That being said, and to paraphrase the NRA, you can have my glow set ups when you pry them out of my cold dead fingers. I love the smell, the sound and even the clean up.
Cheers
Gord
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FrederickMD
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My favorite trainer is the Hanger 9 Alpha. With an OS 46 and an 11x6 APC, it flies very well, is capable of some basic aerobatics, and will be fun to fly after initial training.
Brad
Brad
#23
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: RCVF
... I think thrust is more what a trainer needs.
... I think thrust is more what a trainer needs.
I think the main problem is the airplane is heavy. I haven't weighed it yet (cannot find my scale, but I bought another one yesterday), but it feels like seven or eight pounds.
.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Endicott,
NY
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can usually build a Lt-40 kit in a weekend then another one to cover it... my daughters Lt-40 was built in a weekend flown the following weekend with a TT-46, then last fall I pulled the TT out and converted it to electric.