Gas Saito Radial problems
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gas Saito Radial problems
I have a Saito fg-19 r3. Morris intake mod, Morris prop hub, timed correctly. Running Ethanol free 91 gas. Bench ran for two gallons, 16x8 prop. Runs perfectly on stand turning 7100rpm.
In airplane does not run at full throttle. It dies and starves out. Runs perfectly at idle and transitions great. But at full throttle it will run for a few seconds and then fades out and dies.
I thought it was debris in carb. Nothing.
I thought it was the tank or fuel lines rebuilt the tank. Nothing.
I thought it was air problems and made a hole in fuselage to channel air. Nothing.
In the stand it runs but in the plane it does not 100% of the time.
What’s happening in plane?
Not a walbro carb. Saito pump carb.
No electric fuel pump.
It does it in the airplane static on ground.
Engine not cowled. Just carb in fus.
In airplane does not run at full throttle. It dies and starves out. Runs perfectly at idle and transitions great. But at full throttle it will run for a few seconds and then fades out and dies.
I thought it was debris in carb. Nothing.
I thought it was the tank or fuel lines rebuilt the tank. Nothing.
I thought it was air problems and made a hole in fuselage to channel air. Nothing.
In the stand it runs but in the plane it does not 100% of the time.
What’s happening in plane?
Not a walbro carb. Saito pump carb.
No electric fuel pump.
It does it in the airplane static on ground.
Engine not cowled. Just carb in fus.
#3
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did open up the needle. No difference. Still dies as I come up to full throttle. But with it richer seems to last longer. So maybe fuel issue.
But the thing is that i keep taking the engine on and off the airplane to the test stand. I have yet to replicate this on the test stand. Only in the plane. 100% of The time same. All same components. Tank, ign, mount setup. Only difference was open in back of carb. So that is why I thought air. Made opening in fuselage to direct air directly to carb. No difference.
Yes thought it was air and ran a hole to duct outside air to Venturi. Now plenty of air to suck in at full throttle. Thought it was air. Now I have plenty to get in. Ran same with or without the cowl.
Also, not prop. Tried with many different props. Plus on stand with 16x8 runs flawless. Ran full throttle for 3 min straight no overheat issues on stand. Broke in on stand for 1 1/2 hours. In plane will throttle up to full but then in a few seconds starve. I thought air problems. But no. Maybe tank? I did rebuild tank. Tank about 4 inches back. 4 inch’s low. Yes taildragger.
But the thing is that i keep taking the engine on and off the airplane to the test stand. I have yet to replicate this on the test stand. Only in the plane. 100% of The time same. All same components. Tank, ign, mount setup. Only difference was open in back of carb. So that is why I thought air. Made opening in fuselage to direct air directly to carb. No difference.
Yes thought it was air and ran a hole to duct outside air to Venturi. Now plenty of air to suck in at full throttle. Thought it was air. Now I have plenty to get in. Ran same with or without the cowl.
Also, not prop. Tried with many different props. Plus on stand with 16x8 runs flawless. Ran full throttle for 3 min straight no overheat issues on stand. Broke in on stand for 1 1/2 hours. In plane will throttle up to full but then in a few seconds starve. I thought air problems. But no. Maybe tank? I did rebuild tank. Tank about 4 inches back. 4 inch’s low. Yes taildragger.
#4
I did open up the needle. No difference. Still dies as I come up to full throttle. But with it richer seems to last longer. So maybe fuel issue.
But the thing is that i keep taking the engine on and off the airplane to the test stand. I have yet to replicate this on the test stand. Only in the plane. 100% of The time same. All same components. Tank, ign, mount setup. Only difference was open in back of carb. So that is why I thought air. Made opening in fuselage to direct air directly to carb. No difference.
Yes thought it was air and ran a hole to duct outside air to Venturi. Now plenty of air to suck in at full throttle. Thought it was air. Now I have plenty to get in. Ran same with or without the cowl.
Also, not prop. Tried with many different props. Plus on stand with 16x8 runs flawless. Ran full throttle for 3 min straight no overheat issues on stand. Broke in on stand for 1 1/2 hours. In plane will throttle up to full but then in a few seconds starve. I thought air problems. But no. Maybe tank? I did rebuild tank. Tank about 4 inches back. 4 inch’s low. Yes taildragger.
But the thing is that i keep taking the engine on and off the airplane to the test stand. I have yet to replicate this on the test stand. Only in the plane. 100% of The time same. All same components. Tank, ign, mount setup. Only difference was open in back of carb. So that is why I thought air. Made opening in fuselage to direct air directly to carb. No difference.
Yes thought it was air and ran a hole to duct outside air to Venturi. Now plenty of air to suck in at full throttle. Thought it was air. Now I have plenty to get in. Ran same with or without the cowl.
Also, not prop. Tried with many different props. Plus on stand with 16x8 runs flawless. Ran full throttle for 3 min straight no overheat issues on stand. Broke in on stand for 1 1/2 hours. In plane will throttle up to full but then in a few seconds starve. I thought air problems. But no. Maybe tank? I did rebuild tank. Tank about 4 inches back. 4 inch’s low. Yes taildragger.
#5
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow. Okay. Thank you. I will try.
However, I also did some more experimenting today before I saw your post. I ran a new fuel tank outside the plane to test. I dangled the new tank on the floor next to the gear. Choked it and the carb drew the fuel right up to engine mounted in plane. I started it and it did the same thing as always in plane. My son then raised the tank above the motor and it ran perfectly as on the test stand with the same needle settings as on test stand.
Can this be?
In the plane the tank is about 4in back and 4in below the Venturi centerline. On the test stand I used same tank as in plane and fuel line 4in behind as in plane but may have been only 2 inches lower than carb.
Can this be the difference in run?
Can this also be a pump issue?
How can I verify this?
I guess opening the low end compensates for this?
However, I also did some more experimenting today before I saw your post. I ran a new fuel tank outside the plane to test. I dangled the new tank on the floor next to the gear. Choked it and the carb drew the fuel right up to engine mounted in plane. I started it and it did the same thing as always in plane. My son then raised the tank above the motor and it ran perfectly as on the test stand with the same needle settings as on test stand.
Can this be?
In the plane the tank is about 4in back and 4in below the Venturi centerline. On the test stand I used same tank as in plane and fuel line 4in behind as in plane but may have been only 2 inches lower than carb.
Can this be the difference in run?
Can this also be a pump issue?
How can I verify this?
I guess opening the low end compensates for this?
Last edited by lazun; 05-10-2021 at 03:18 AM.
#7
My Feedback: (3)
First thing that came to mind is tank location so based on your experiment you answered the question. The tank position should also be covered in the Saito manual. The tank should be even with the carb not below so it can draw fuel.
Another thing to check is back pressure from the exhaust to the tank. I run this on the FG60 radial and it’s pretty much required for smooth operation. I tried it w/o and had poor results.
The FG90 doesn’t seem to need this. I’ve run the FG30 as well and it didn’t have the back pressure line, sure enough in flight it lost power.
Also now that you have some time on the engine you might want to check the valves and adjust them as needed.
Another thing to check is back pressure from the exhaust to the tank. I run this on the FG60 radial and it’s pretty much required for smooth operation. I tried it w/o and had poor results.
The FG90 doesn’t seem to need this. I’ve run the FG30 as well and it didn’t have the back pressure line, sure enough in flight it lost power.
Also now that you have some time on the engine you might want to check the valves and adjust them as needed.
#8
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So tap into exhaust ring and run to vent line of tank? Does this create problems with the dirty oily exhaust to the tank? What do you do?
Also how do I know the pump works on this carb? It should do something to help with flow? But how does it work on Saito and how can I verify it’s working? As you can see it’s a Saito pump system carb.
#9
My Feedback: (3)
The Keleo pipe had a tube for the 60 but if yours doesn’t then you can probably use a Dubro brass fitting. For the dirty oily residue I just put an in-line filter but after some time running this it didn’t seem to be a big deal so I removed the filter. The residue was minimal. The location is at the 12oclock position for max back pressure but you can be left or right of that as needed in case the exhaust port fitting is in your way.
Worst case if it’s not helping you can plug it but most likely it should help keep positive fuel pressure.
Worst case if it’s not helping you can plug it but most likely it should help keep positive fuel pressure.
#10
Wow. Okay. Thank you. I will try.
However, I also did some more experimenting today before I saw your post. I ran a new fuel tank outside the plane to test. I dangled the new tank on the floor next to the gear. Choked it and the carb drew the fuel right up to engine mounted in plane. I started it and it did the same thing as always in plane. My son then raised the tank above the motor and it ran perfectly as on the test stand with the same needle settings as on test stand.
Can this be?
In the plane the tank is about 4in back and 4in below the Venturi centerline. On the test stand I used same tank as in plane and fuel line 4in behind as in plane but may have been only 2 inches lower than carb.
Can this be the difference in run?
Can this also be a pump issue?
How can I verify this?
I guess opening the low end compensates for this?
However, I also did some more experimenting today before I saw your post. I ran a new fuel tank outside the plane to test. I dangled the new tank on the floor next to the gear. Choked it and the carb drew the fuel right up to engine mounted in plane. I started it and it did the same thing as always in plane. My son then raised the tank above the motor and it ran perfectly as on the test stand with the same needle settings as on test stand.
Can this be?
In the plane the tank is about 4in back and 4in below the Venturi centerline. On the test stand I used same tank as in plane and fuel line 4in behind as in plane but may have been only 2 inches lower than carb.
Can this be the difference in run?
Can this also be a pump issue?
How can I verify this?
I guess opening the low end compensates for this?
#11
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally got to it. I did a lot of things that was suggested, and I think they will all help. I may not know what will cure it exactly.
1. Rebuilt new tank with XL fuel line, recommended on Saito website. Can’t hurt.
2. Raised tank as high as possible in airplane. Can’t hurt.
3. Brought tank closer to firewall. Can’t hurt.
4. Made an intake scoop for carb air. Can’t hurt
5. Opened low and high end needles.
6. Gaps all done, plugs and carb is clean and working correctly.
All this took a while to rebuild around my days off from work. Mounting everything back in plane and will be ready to run in plane on my next day off. Thanks for all the help.
1. Rebuilt new tank with XL fuel line, recommended on Saito website. Can’t hurt.
2. Raised tank as high as possible in airplane. Can’t hurt.
3. Brought tank closer to firewall. Can’t hurt.
4. Made an intake scoop for carb air. Can’t hurt
5. Opened low and high end needles.
6. Gaps all done, plugs and carb is clean and working correctly.
All this took a while to rebuild around my days off from work. Mounting everything back in plane and will be ready to run in plane on my next day off. Thanks for all the help.
#12
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finally got to run the motor in plane. It took different needle settings to run correctly. 1 3/4 high end 5 7/8 low end. You are correct that the low end also affects the high end significantly. Both needles run on the same tube like a glow engine. The pump sucks. Motor transitions good. Runs if I point it straight up or down. But sometimes quits at full throttle instantly if I lower nose too fast from a nose high attitude.
#13
I finally got to run the motor in plane. It took different needle settings to run correctly. 1 3/4 high end 5 7/8 low end. You are correct that the low end also affects the high end significantly. Both needles run on the same tube like a glow engine. The pump sucks. Motor transitions good. Runs if I point it straight up or down. But sometimes quits at full throttle instantly if I lower nose too fast from a nose high attitude.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saito Radials MORRIS conversion
I would like to get a Saito Radial for the sound alone but there seems to be a lot of problems with them. I wouldn't use a cowl. I'd want to see it. Does the Morris Mini Motors conversion solve the problems with them? Is one Saito Radial better than the other? I'm leaning towards the FG19R3 but maybe the larger ones are better.
I have a Saito FA100. Does the MMM gas conversion work well on that motor?
Any input is greatly appreciated. Frankly, I'm bored with electric foamy's. Ready to return to the days of yesteryear and listen to the sound of a real engine.
I have a Saito FA100. Does the MMM gas conversion work well on that motor?
Any input is greatly appreciated. Frankly, I'm bored with electric foamy's. Ready to return to the days of yesteryear and listen to the sound of a real engine.
#15
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would be very careful with your setup. Everything must be right. Pump very weak. Tank placement is critical, air, and prop. My plane weighs 12.5 lbs and is a trainer with a large wing. Barely enough power. Always need a bigger 4 stroke than 2 stroke for same power. Any maneuvers mixture changes constantly. If you are going around in circles and doing touch and goes like I am and power not an issue fine. If not you will need a lot of patience. my setup…
https://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/...d.php?t=309729
https://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/...d.php?t=309729
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saito radials
Thanks for the quick reply. Rascals have such a classic look. My .40 size Rascal is waiting for the engine install. It sounds like the FG19R3 would be a good fit for a scratch-built SIG LT-40 that I have gathering dust.