Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2008, 10:38 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rcbobp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I have a Dave Patrick Ultimate with a Webra 1.20. I've never been totally happy with the Webra's performance. Not very consistent...usually runs a little sluggish. Due to an unfortunate incident involving gravity and my late, great Super Chipmunk, I now have a spare O.S. 1.08. The OS ran great and provided the Chipmunk with superb power. Any thoughts on whether this would be a good substitute on the Ultimate?
Old 09-17-2008, 11:30 AM
  #2  
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

The Webra 1.20 is the equivalent of a Swiss watch when it comes to running smoothly, you must not have it set correctly.
Old 09-17-2008, 11:55 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rcbobp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I do have the same engine in a Super Stearman, and it works fine. Perhaps I hit upon some Swiss Cheese, because after 3 years of adjusting, and having more experienced people than I trying to adjust it, I can't seem to get it running properly on a consistent basis. Sorry, but I guess even Webra isn't perfect.
Old 09-17-2008, 12:25 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Loxahatchee, FL
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I have several Webra motors including the 1.20. I also have many OS's inlcuding two OS 1.08s. Power wise they are about the same. Both are great running motors. The OS 1.08 does not like small chamber mufflers as they tend to run hot and quit. The Webra 1.20 like good fuel draw and short fuel lines and/or a pump. Both turn 15X6 and 16X6 props with no problem. I have not had good luck mounting either one inverted.
Old 09-17-2008, 01:44 PM
  #5  
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

It also likes 5% nitro max.
Old 09-17-2008, 03:13 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: STOCKHOLM Akersberga, SWEDEN
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I do not have the Webra120 but I do have the OS108 and this engine is wonderfull. OS108 has everything one could ask for when it comes to twostroke engines and burns any fuel from 5-20% nitro with no problem. The engine becomes even more powerfull if you use a quiet pipe and a Perry VP-30 pump/regulator. Thats my setup with a OS-F glowplug, works great!
Old 09-18-2008, 12:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: bedford, TX
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

What fuel are you using in the Webra 1.20?
Old 09-18-2008, 04:44 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rcbobp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I've used both 10% and 15%.
Old 09-18-2008, 11:04 AM
  #9  
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I have found that both the OS108 and Webra 120 engines are excellent engines. I still fly a 20 year old 1.08.

Performance edge would go to the Webra, but only by a bit.

One thing on the Webra - if you are using an aftermarket muffler the engine NEEDS good backpressure and stable muffler pressue to the fuel tank to run well. Some pitts type scale exhauts are a bit too large, low back pressure, and the engine will struggle to run consistantly. Something to consider. If you have a twin-tube exhaust, try a little experiment block off one side (temporarily) and see if the engine responds favorably.
Old 09-18-2008, 01:58 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rcbobp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I tried it and it really didn't help much. I'm running a Webra 1.20 on my Super Stearman with a Bisson Pitts muffler, no block, and it runs fine. Could be I have a less than stellar performer. Heck, even the best of them have a bad day once in a while.
Old 09-18-2008, 04:10 PM
  #11  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Loxahatchee, FL
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I run 15% in pretty much everything except Moki's. How much time is on your 1.20? Could be that it's just not broken in yet. Try 5% fuel as Hobbsy said. What kind of prop and numbers are you getting? What type of carb is it, rotating barrel or slide type?
Old 09-19-2008, 07:54 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20


ORIGINAL: Hobbsy

It also likes 5% nitro max.
RC-Bop,


I fully agree and endorse Dave's words.

If your Webra 1.20 is broken-in properly, running too much nitro in it makes it misbehave...


Glow engines are originally designed to run with a methanol/oil mix... US costs and availability made higher nitro fuels more popular there, but European made engines that were not 'Americanized', still need no-to-low nitro, or to be 'decompressed', to run well on 15% nitro.

Old 09-19-2008, 10:16 AM
  #13  
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro. Or at some time Webra has made that engine with a lower compression ratio.
Old 09-19-2008, 10:39 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20


ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
Hugh,


Adding head shims to reduce the C/R is the lesser of the two solutions...

The squish clearance is an important attribute in any engine, which among other properties determines how it runs and the power it makes.
Adding head shims increases the squish clearance, making the engine less tolerant to higher compression ratios...

So, to adjust for higher nitro, you will need to reduce compression, by more than you would if you opt for a 'nitro head' that simply has a slightly larger 'bowl', with the same squish clearance.
Old 09-19-2008, 11:29 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I have 3 Webra 120s. Running them 15% nitro, misbehave is an understatement.

Denis
Old 09-19-2008, 11:57 AM
  #16  
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

Dennis, you think the Webra 1.20 gets contrary on 15% nitro, you should try it in a SuperTigre 3000, no fun at all.
Old 09-19-2008, 12:10 PM
  #17  
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20


ORIGINAL: DarZeelon


ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
Hugh,


Adding head shims to reduce the C/R is the lesser of the two solutions...

The squish clearance is an important attribute in any engine, which among other properties determines how it runs and the power it makes.
Adding head shims increases the squish clearance, making the engine less tolerant to higher compression ratios...

So, to adjust for higher nitro, you will need to reduce compression, by more than you would if you opt for a 'nitro head' that simply has a slightly larger 'bowl', with the same squish clearance.

How does that make the existing Webra on the Stearman not have shims? I never said it was or was not the best solution. However, it would be a lot cheaper than buying a low compression head, if such a thing even exists.
Old 09-19-2008, 12:19 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

The ST 2300 can turn ugly on 15% also even though the instructions say 15% is OK. I don't try to run any of my 2 cycle engines in this size range or bigger on more than 5% intentionally. It's just counterproductive.

Denis
Old 09-19-2008, 12:55 PM
  #19  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Loxahatchee, FL
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

I have two ST 2500's and one 2000. All run 15%. One 2500 turns a Mezjlik 18X8 at 8900. Was always tearing up gears in the Hitec 605 servos from pushing my Sig Cap too hard. Some like more nitro, some like less. Experiment until you find what YOUR engine likes best.
Old 09-19-2008, 01:06 PM
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

Hi!
Isn't it so that all Webras are made to run on 0-5% nitro? At least the Webra GT .40 I have run in Q-500 pylon here in Sweden are such good engines on just 0% nitro.
No running in is needed with modern ABC, ABN and AAC engines!! They throttle perfectly even from the start...provided you run the right fuel.
Old 09-19-2008, 03:46 PM
  #21  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rcbobp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

This is one of the things I like about the hobby. Ask 3 people a question and get 4 opinions . I'll try messing with my nitro content and see what happens. I will say this...the engine that gives me the problems has almost no compression when cold, but I'm told that's to be expected of the Webra. Is this so?
Old 09-19-2008, 04:18 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

The Webra 120 uses a dykes ring. This will show very little compression when turned over by hand. The ring is a low tension ring and relies on combustion pressure to seal.

Denis
Old 09-19-2008, 06:10 PM
  #23  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Loxahatchee, FL
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20

My 1.20 has good compression (just had it in my hands) maybe not as much as an ABC but it does have a distinct compression stoke. My Speed .61, Blackhead .61 and Speed 40 are flawless on 15% nitro.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.