O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills,
MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I have a Dave Patrick Ultimate with a Webra 1.20. I've never been totally happy with the Webra's performance. Not very consistent...usually runs a little sluggish. Due to an unfortunate incident involving gravity and my late, great Super Chipmunk, I now have a spare O.S. 1.08. The OS ran great and provided the Chipmunk with superb power. Any thoughts on whether this would be a good substitute on the Ultimate?
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills,
MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I do have the same engine in a Super Stearman, and it works fine. Perhaps I hit upon some Swiss Cheese, because after 3 years of adjusting, and having more experienced people than I trying to adjust it, I can't seem to get it running properly on a consistent basis. Sorry, but I guess even Webra isn't perfect.
#4
My Feedback: (5)
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I have several Webra motors including the 1.20. I also have many OS's inlcuding two OS 1.08s. Power wise they are about the same. Both are great running motors. The OS 1.08 does not like small chamber mufflers as they tend to run hot and quit. The Webra 1.20 like good fuel draw and short fuel lines and/or a pump. Both turn 15X6 and 16X6 props with no problem. I have not had good luck mounting either one inverted.
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: STOCKHOLM Akersberga, SWEDEN
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I do not have the Webra120 but I do have the OS108 and this engine is wonderfull. OS108 has everything one could ask for when it comes to twostroke engines and burns any fuel from 5-20% nitro with no problem. The engine becomes even more powerfull if you use a quiet pipe and a Perry VP-30 pump/regulator. Thats my setup with a OS-F glowplug, works great!
#9
My Feedback: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland,
OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I have found that both the OS108 and Webra 120 engines are excellent engines. I still fly a 20 year old 1.08.
Performance edge would go to the Webra, but only by a bit.
One thing on the Webra - if you are using an aftermarket muffler the engine NEEDS good backpressure and stable muffler pressue to the fuel tank to run well. Some pitts type scale exhauts are a bit too large, low back pressure, and the engine will struggle to run consistantly. Something to consider. If you have a twin-tube exhaust, try a little experiment block off one side (temporarily) and see if the engine responds favorably.
Performance edge would go to the Webra, but only by a bit.
One thing on the Webra - if you are using an aftermarket muffler the engine NEEDS good backpressure and stable muffler pressue to the fuel tank to run well. Some pitts type scale exhauts are a bit too large, low back pressure, and the engine will struggle to run consistantly. Something to consider. If you have a twin-tube exhaust, try a little experiment block off one side (temporarily) and see if the engine responds favorably.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills,
MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I tried it and it really didn't help much. I'm running a Webra 1.20 on my Super Stearman with a Bisson Pitts muffler, no block, and it runs fine. Could be I have a less than stellar performer. Heck, even the best of them have a bad day once in a while.
#11
My Feedback: (5)
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I run 15% in pretty much everything except Moki's. How much time is on your 1.20? Could be that it's just not broken in yet. Try 5% fuel as Hobbsy said. What kind of prop and numbers are you getting? What type of carb is it, rotating barrel or slide type?
#12
Senior Member
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
ORIGINAL: Hobbsy
It also likes 5% nitro max.
It also likes 5% nitro max.
I fully agree and endorse Dave's words.
If your Webra 1.20 is broken-in properly, running too much nitro in it makes it misbehave...
Glow engines are originally designed to run with a methanol/oil mix... US costs and availability made higher nitro fuels more popular there, but European made engines that were not 'Americanized', still need no-to-low nitro, or to be 'decompressed', to run well on 15% nitro.
#13
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro. Or at some time Webra has made that engine with a lower compression ratio.
#14
Senior Member
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
Adding head shims to reduce the C/R is the lesser of the two solutions...
The squish clearance is an important attribute in any engine, which among other properties determines how it runs and the power it makes.
Adding head shims increases the squish clearance, making the engine less tolerant to higher compression ratios...
So, to adjust for higher nitro, you will need to reduce compression, by more than you would if you opt for a 'nitro head' that simply has a slightly larger 'bowl', with the same squish clearance.
#17
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
ORIGINAL: DarZeelon
Hugh,
Adding head shims to reduce the C/R is the lesser of the two solutions...
The squish clearance is an important attribute in any engine, which among other properties determines how it runs and the power it makes.
Adding head shims increases the squish clearance, making the engine less tolerant to higher compression ratios...
So, to adjust for higher nitro, you will need to reduce compression, by more than you would if you opt for a 'nitro head' that simply has a slightly larger 'bowl', with the same squish clearance.
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
It could be your Webra has shims added under the head to allow higher nitro...
Adding head shims to reduce the C/R is the lesser of the two solutions...
The squish clearance is an important attribute in any engine, which among other properties determines how it runs and the power it makes.
Adding head shims increases the squish clearance, making the engine less tolerant to higher compression ratios...
So, to adjust for higher nitro, you will need to reduce compression, by more than you would if you opt for a 'nitro head' that simply has a slightly larger 'bowl', with the same squish clearance.
How does that make the existing Webra on the Stearman not have shims? I never said it was or was not the best solution. However, it would be a lot cheaper than buying a low compression head, if such a thing even exists.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
The ST 2300 can turn ugly on 15% also even though the instructions say 15% is OK. I don't try to run any of my 2 cycle engines in this size range or bigger on more than 5% intentionally. It's just counterproductive.
Denis
Denis
#19
My Feedback: (5)
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
I have two ST 2500's and one 2000. All run 15%. One 2500 turns a Mezjlik 18X8 at 8900. Was always tearing up gears in the Hitec 605 servos from pushing my Sig Cap too hard. Some like more nitro, some like less. Experiment until you find what YOUR engine likes best.
#20
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
Hi!
Isn't it so that all Webras are made to run on 0-5% nitro? At least the Webra GT .40 I have run in Q-500 pylon here in Sweden are such good engines on just 0% nitro.
No running in is needed with modern ABC, ABN and AAC engines!! They throttle perfectly even from the start...provided you run the right fuel.
Isn't it so that all Webras are made to run on 0-5% nitro? At least the Webra GT .40 I have run in Q-500 pylon here in Sweden are such good engines on just 0% nitro.
No running in is needed with modern ABC, ABN and AAC engines!! They throttle perfectly even from the start...provided you run the right fuel.
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Owings Mills,
MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
This is one of the things I like about the hobby. Ask 3 people a question and get 4 opinions . I'll try messing with my nitro content and see what happens. I will say this...the engine that gives me the problems has almost no compression when cold, but I'm told that's to be expected of the Webra. Is this so?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: O.S. 1.08 vs Webra 1.20
The Webra 120 uses a dykes ring. This will show very little compression when turned over by hand. The ring is a low tension ring and relies on combustion pressure to seal.
Denis
Denis