Onboard Alternator
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rogate, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Onboard Alternator
Why dont some of the better known engine manufacturers incorporate an alternator with/near the starter motor so we can have constant electrical supply while the engines are running??? This can maybe supply a charging current to the battery to keep it from depleting and reduce the dangers of running out of electrical juice.
#4
RE: Onboard Alternator
I'm sure it is possible and I'm sure someone will do it soon.
I guess a slight problem is the RPM involved. An electric motor (alternator) will probably not stand up to 160,000 RPM. A gearbox will be required which will add considerable complexity to the relatively simple model engines. I guess it would be pretty easy on a turboprop that already has a gearbox.
I guess a slight problem is the RPM involved. An electric motor (alternator) will probably not stand up to 160,000 RPM. A gearbox will be required which will add considerable complexity to the relatively simple model engines. I guess it would be pretty easy on a turboprop that already has a gearbox.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rogate, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
Another way would be to have a freely rotating light mini turbine sitting in the exhaust duct driven by exhaust gases.
#6
RE: Onboard Alternator
That is similar to how a turboprop/turboshaft engine works. The difference is that they are designed to convert the accelerated exhaust gases back into mechanical power.
In a turbojet (model engine) the power is gained directly from the high velocity exhaust. Anything that is put in this gas flow will significantly reduce the power output of the engine.
In a turbojet (model engine) the power is gained directly from the high velocity exhaust. Anything that is put in this gas flow will significantly reduce the power output of the engine.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: Zack Morris
Another way would be to have a freely rotating light mini turbine sitting in the exhaust duct driven by exhaust gases.
Another way would be to have a freely rotating light mini turbine sitting in the exhaust duct driven by exhaust gases.
Personally I would sooner see a bleed taken off the compressor to keep my air tanks topped up.
regards,
John.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: Zack Morris
Another way would be to have a freely rotating light mini turbine sitting in the exhaust duct driven by exhaust gases.
Another way would be to have a freely rotating light mini turbine sitting in the exhaust duct driven by exhaust gases.
#12
RE: Onboard Alternator
Full size aircraft use a RAT (Ram Air Turbine). This is a small windmill that sticks out into the airflow (not the jet pipe/exhaust gases). On full size aircraft this can provide electrical and hydraulic power. Personally, I would prefer this to having anything in the exhaust section.
I must admit that I don't actually know how much power you would lose by putting a propellor in the exhaust. Bear in mind that 2-3 cm is quite big in comparison with the size of the engine turbine section. (This obviously depends on which engine you are using).
I must admit that I don't actually know how much power you would lose by putting a propellor in the exhaust. Bear in mind that 2-3 cm is quite big in comparison with the size of the engine turbine section. (This obviously depends on which engine you are using).
#15
My Feedback: (21)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: JohnMac...
I would sooner see a bleed taken off the compressor to keep my air tanks topped up.
regards,
John.
I would sooner see a bleed taken off the compressor to keep my air tanks topped up.
regards,
John.
Now you're talking complex! A compressor bleed air system will require a pressure regulator, overpressure safety valve, and most likely a heat exchanger to function properly. Not to mention the significant power loss created!
#16
RE: Onboard Alternator
Full size aircraft use a RAT (Ram Air Turbine). This is a small windmill that sticks out into the airflow (not the jet pipe/exhaust gases). On full size aircraft this can provide electrical and hydraulic power. Personally, I would prefer this to having anything in the exhaust section.
Regards,
David Gladwin.
#17
My Feedback: (21)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: David Gladwin
The RAT is only used when everything else has failed. Each engine has an alternator , driven by a complex and heavy CSU (constant speed unit) and a hydraulic pump. In the event of engine failure the APU (auxiliary power unit) can be used to supply electrical, and therefore hydraulic, power. When all that fails the ram air turbine is exteneded, very rarely happens !
Regards,
David Gladwin.
Full size aircraft use a RAT (Ram Air Turbine). This is a small windmill that sticks out into the airflow (not the jet pipe/exhaust gases). On full size aircraft this can provide electrical and hydraulic power. Personally, I would prefer this to having anything in the exhaust section.
Regards,
David Gladwin.
#18
My Feedback: (2)
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: Lt. Dan
Now you're talking complex! A compressor bleed air system will require a pressure regulator, overpressure safety valve, and most likely a heat exchanger to function properly. Not to mention the significant power loss created!
ORIGINAL: JohnMac...
I would sooner see a bleed taken off the compressor to keep my air tanks topped up.
regards,
John.
I would sooner see a bleed taken off the compressor to keep my air tanks topped up.
regards,
John.
Now you're talking complex! A compressor bleed air system will require a pressure regulator, overpressure safety valve, and most likely a heat exchanger to function properly. Not to mention the significant power loss created!
You're right about the heat problem though, if you assume the leak causes a significant flow rate of air. When testing a JG-100 in 2001, I hooked up a case pressure line to an off-the shelf pneumatic gage and ran the motor. The engine worked and the gage registered the pressure level expected. The pressure line we was just a simple yellow Festo hose plumed to a right angle 4mm bulkhead fitting on the diffuser cover, just like the propane and fuel lines used on other motors. I then made the mistake of switching the gage while the motor was running for a more accurate one I had on hand. Funny though, after I switched it neither gage worked... Ignorantly, I ran it for another few minutes and the performance still looked within the spec.
I shut the motor down and pulled off the fairing to see why the gage stopped working... In that few seconds of free venting through the 4mm hose, enough hot air passed through the fitting to melt the plastic right-angle portion and the section of hose immediately following it... In a lower flow rate, I'd assume we could plum the system with a length or two of aluminum or brass tubes to act as heat exchangers to the ambient air in the fuselage. Its added weight, but I don't think it would be too difficult to make it work, just don't expect to get 120psi out of it... If a leak did happen, the plane would probably still limp home. I think the AMT Netherlands engines use a system like this to propel smoke oil.
Kelly
#19
RE: Onboard Alternator
Yes, and then there was the Gimlee Glider.
Regards, David Gladwin (ex 767 capt).
For those who don't know what the Gimlee glider was, it was an Air Canada 767 which ran out of fuel because they had despatched with u/s fuel guages and had misintepreted the tank dripstick calibrations. The aircraft was landed on a disused airstrip being used for drag racing. The only damage was a collapsed noseleg !
#20
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
Now you're talking complex! A compressor bleed air system will require a pressure regulator, overpressure safety valve, and most likely a heat exchanger to function properly. Not to mention the significant power loss created!
[/quote]
Lt Dan,
Well it has already been done. I talked to the boys fromJetworld in Germany when the visisted the JMA AGM in the UK a couple of years ago, and they showed me a prototype system. They then published details in the German Jetpower magazine.
A pressure regulation system would be required but a simple mechanical device could be used. Getting one small a light enough might be the problem. Pressure loss has already been dealt with, it's insignificant; but the point you make about temparature rise may provide a difficulty. When you compress air it gets hot, but is air bled from our compressors hot enough to cause a problem?
The lack of a commercailly available system has prevented me from going any further with this idea.
Regards,
John.
[/quote]
Lt Dan,
Well it has already been done. I talked to the boys fromJetworld in Germany when the visisted the JMA AGM in the UK a couple of years ago, and they showed me a prototype system. They then published details in the German Jetpower magazine.
A pressure regulation system would be required but a simple mechanical device could be used. Getting one small a light enough might be the problem. Pressure loss has already been dealt with, it's insignificant; but the point you make about temparature rise may provide a difficulty. When you compress air it gets hot, but is air bled from our compressors hot enough to cause a problem?
The lack of a commercailly available system has prevented me from going any further with this idea.
Regards,
John.
#21
My Feedback: (21)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
ORIGINAL: JohnMac
Lt Dan,
Well it has already been done. I talked to the boys fromJetworld in Germany when the visisted the JMA AGM in the UK a couple of years ago, and they showed me a prototype system. They then published details in the German Jetpower magazine.
A pressure regulation system would be required but a simple mechanical device could be used. Getting one small a light enough might be the problem. Pressure loss has already been dealt with, it's insignificant; but the point you make about temparature rise may provide a difficulty. When you compress air it gets hot, but is air bled from our compressors hot enough to cause a problem?
The lack of a commercailly available system has prevented me from going any further with this idea.
Regards,
John.
Lt Dan,
Well it has already been done. I talked to the boys fromJetworld in Germany when the visisted the JMA AGM in the UK a couple of years ago, and they showed me a prototype system. They then published details in the German Jetpower magazine.
A pressure regulation system would be required but a simple mechanical device could be used. Getting one small a light enough might be the problem. Pressure loss has already been dealt with, it's insignificant; but the point you make about temparature rise may provide a difficulty. When you compress air it gets hot, but is air bled from our compressors hot enough to cause a problem?
The lack of a commercailly available system has prevented me from going any further with this idea.
Regards,
John.
I never said it was impossible, just complex!
The bleed temp depends on where you bleed it from, of course, our engines are single stage compressors so you don't really have much choice. On the big jets, bleed air is taken from several different compressor stages at different temperatures. It passes through a regulating valve and then through a precooler (heat exchanger) where the heat is exchanged through cold ram air from the fan section (another valve), before it is passed on into the aircraft for use. I would love to have onboard electrical generation and bleed air, but it becomes a big departure from the KISS concept that I love!
#22
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
I never said it was impossible, just complex!
The bleed temp depends on where you bleed it from, of course, our engines are single stage compressors so you don't really have much choice. On the big jets, bleed air is taken from several different compressor stages at different temperatures. It passes through a regulating valve and then through a precooler (heat exchanger) where the heat is exchanged through cold ram air from the fan section (another valve), before it is passed on into the aircraft for use. I would love to have onboard electrical generation and bleed air, but it becomes a big departure from the KISS concept that I love!
[/quote]
Well I agree with that, our jets are complex enough. When I anylise why I want an air bleed system it is because I have had problem with pressure loss due to my brakes. So in retrospect I think I will buy some better brakes that don't leak half the time and add simplicity.
Regards,
John.
The bleed temp depends on where you bleed it from, of course, our engines are single stage compressors so you don't really have much choice. On the big jets, bleed air is taken from several different compressor stages at different temperatures. It passes through a regulating valve and then through a precooler (heat exchanger) where the heat is exchanged through cold ram air from the fan section (another valve), before it is passed on into the aircraft for use. I would love to have onboard electrical generation and bleed air, but it becomes a big departure from the KISS concept that I love!
[/quote]
Well I agree with that, our jets are complex enough. When I anylise why I want an air bleed system it is because I have had problem with pressure loss due to my brakes. So in retrospect I think I will buy some better brakes that don't leak half the time and add simplicity.
Regards,
John.
#23
Senior Member
My Feedback: (51)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western NC
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
David
I am a current 767 Capt with a US Airline was the Air Canada incident you?
I remember when it happened and it was a terrific job of getting her down in one piece.
Not unlike the Air Transat which at least had the energy vector arc for help in LPLA. Seems like u Canadian guys are good at dead sticking it in.
PM me if you want to take this private probably not something everyone will appreciate.
I am a current 767 Capt with a US Airline was the Air Canada incident you?
I remember when it happened and it was a terrific job of getting her down in one piece.
Not unlike the Air Transat which at least had the energy vector arc for help in LPLA. Seems like u Canadian guys are good at dead sticking it in.
PM me if you want to take this private probably not something everyone will appreciate.
#24
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: auckland, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Onboard Alternator
http://www.wadenelson.com/gimli.html
The Gimli glider story - yep the RAT saved the day!
Cheers from NZ!
The Gimli glider story - yep the RAT saved the day!
Cheers from NZ!
#25
RE: Onboard Alternator
The A/C 767 was a good save but so was the 747 incident when all four engines flamed out and were seriously damaged over Indonesia due to the ingestion of volcanic dust.
Regards, David Gladwin
Regards, David Gladwin