Powering aircraft carrier
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Using an azimuth thruster would not be scale for that era of warship, so I would say no to that idea.
Depending on the thickness of your prop in pvc would determine if it would stand up.
I have a RNLI Trent Class kit that came with vinyl props. Since I can twist the blades slightly in my hands I have decided not to use them and to go with brass props. You could use them in a combat ship, as long as the thrust ( torgue) of your motors was not such that they would distort the prop. Since you have the ability to make them I would try, it would make for an interesting experiment.
Depending on the thickness of your prop in pvc would determine if it would stand up.
I have a RNLI Trent Class kit that came with vinyl props. Since I can twist the blades slightly in my hands I have decided not to use them and to go with brass props. You could use them in a combat ship, as long as the thrust ( torgue) of your motors was not such that they would distort the prop. Since you have the ability to make them I would try, it would make for an interesting experiment.
#27
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Goffstown,
NH
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry if I was a little confusing, I am not trying to to be scale. This is a project for fun and experience using cad and other engineering skills. I was wondering what you might think of the amount of thrust/maneuverability provided by thrusters as opposed to direct drive. Thanks for the help though. I guess the props will just be trial and error, have to make a few at a time for cost efffectiveness, its $50 a batch, can probably fit like 15 3" props though
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Altos,
CA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nothing teaches CAD skills like trying to duplicate the complex curvature of a modern battleship hull. Besides, you'll have enough work to do simply locating the hardware inside and designing the mounts for it.
#29
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mianus, YT,
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry to be a downer but I do not see this project coming to fruition.
From what I have gathered in your posts you are in way over your head.
Fully functional catapult system and sub dock...yeah right...good luck!
I will offer you a piece of advice though, as a grad holding a BMET degree and a background in fluid mechanics/dynamics as well as several years of Solidworks, you should set your standards lower and forget about accurately designing a hull in Solidworks. To do so you will have to rely heavily on surface modeling which your average high school student knows nothing of, most of them just know extrude/revolves and their variations. Also, your dinky little pistons will absolutely not be able to work for a catapult system as they cannot flow enough CFM to properly propel a plane at enough speed to be able to take off from the deck.
You will meet a lot of old timers in this hobby, nothing wrong with that because they know a lot more than I do, however the down side is they are almost always very optimistic and as for me I am a realist and I am sorry but I just don't see this happening.
And to the guy who posted earlier about a 31' battleship that holds 15 planes with bb's and torpedo's and a 90hp motor...haha yeah right! Probably just some 13 year old kid with his head in the clouds...
Anyways, read the advice I gave you carefully and then decide where you want to go from there.
From what I have gathered in your posts you are in way over your head.
Fully functional catapult system and sub dock...yeah right...good luck!
I will offer you a piece of advice though, as a grad holding a BMET degree and a background in fluid mechanics/dynamics as well as several years of Solidworks, you should set your standards lower and forget about accurately designing a hull in Solidworks. To do so you will have to rely heavily on surface modeling which your average high school student knows nothing of, most of them just know extrude/revolves and their variations. Also, your dinky little pistons will absolutely not be able to work for a catapult system as they cannot flow enough CFM to properly propel a plane at enough speed to be able to take off from the deck.
You will meet a lot of old timers in this hobby, nothing wrong with that because they know a lot more than I do, however the down side is they are almost always very optimistic and as for me I am a realist and I am sorry but I just don't see this happening.
And to the guy who posted earlier about a 31' battleship that holds 15 planes with bb's and torpedo's and a 90hp motor...haha yeah right! Probably just some 13 year old kid with his head in the clouds...
Anyways, read the advice I gave you carefully and then decide where you want to go from there.
#30
Senior Member
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: Starfox9
Sorry to be a downer but I do not see this project coming to fruition.
From what I have gathered in your posts you are in way over your head.
Fully functional catapult system and sub dock...yeah right...good luck!
I will offer you a piece of advice though, as a grad holding a BMET degree and a background in fluid mechanics/dynamics as well as several years of Solidworks, you should set your standards lower and forget about accurately designing a hull in Solidworks. Also, your dinky little pistons will absolutely not be able to work for a catapult system as they cannot flow enough CFM to properly propel a plane at enough speed to be able to take off from the deck.
You will meet a lot of old timers in this hobby, nothing wrong with that because they know a lot more than I do, however the down side is they are almost always very optimistic and as for me I am a realist and I am sorry but I just don't see this happening.
And to the guy who posted earlier about a 31' battleship that holds 15 planes with bb's and torpedo's and a 90hp motor...haha yeah right! Probably just some 13 year old kid with his head in the clouds...
Anyways, read the advice I gave you carefully and then decide where you want to go from there.
Sorry to be a downer but I do not see this project coming to fruition.
From what I have gathered in your posts you are in way over your head.
Fully functional catapult system and sub dock...yeah right...good luck!
I will offer you a piece of advice though, as a grad holding a BMET degree and a background in fluid mechanics/dynamics as well as several years of Solidworks, you should set your standards lower and forget about accurately designing a hull in Solidworks. Also, your dinky little pistons will absolutely not be able to work for a catapult system as they cannot flow enough CFM to properly propel a plane at enough speed to be able to take off from the deck.
You will meet a lot of old timers in this hobby, nothing wrong with that because they know a lot more than I do, however the down side is they are almost always very optimistic and as for me I am a realist and I am sorry but I just don't see this happening.
And to the guy who posted earlier about a 31' battleship that holds 15 planes with bb's and torpedo's and a 90hp motor...haha yeah right! Probably just some 13 year old kid with his head in the clouds...
Anyways, read the advice I gave you carefully and then decide where you want to go from there.
LOL.. .
![Big Grin](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)