Is a Lockheed P-38 lighting good 1st scratcher?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Checotah, OK
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm pretty new to the airplane scene and have always wanted to get into the scratch building segment of the field. I have found a set of plans for a Lockheed P-38 Lighting, which I would really like to build, and its got a 108" wing span and calls for twin Ryobi 31CC Engines. It seems to be a little overpowered, but like I said I.m new to the field. Looking for some advice on the subject.
#2
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
My Feedback: (90)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elephant Butte, N.M.
Posts: 6,716
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The P-38 is one of the most complex models to build, and takes skill to fly. Due to the design of 2 booms and a center pod, the systems become very complicated. The engines being spaced a large distance from the center line make flying it in an engine out situation "tense" at the very least.
Not a good first scratch-build, not a good first build, & not a good first twin. I speak from experience, and I am sure those in the "know", will tell you the sme thing.
Check out the "Twins and Multi-Engine" forum for a lot of info.
Not a good first scratch-build, not a good first build, & not a good first twin. I speak from experience, and I am sure those in the "know", will tell you the sme thing.
Check out the "Twins and Multi-Engine" forum for a lot of info.
#3
Senior Member
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: mark_chininia
I'm pretty new to the airplane scene and have always wanted to get into the scratch building segment of the field. I have found a set of plans for a Lockheed P-38 Lighting, which I would really like to build, and its got a 108" wing span and calls for twin Ryobi 31CC Engines. It seems to be a little overpowered, but like I said I.m new to the field. Looking for some advice on the subject.
I'm pretty new to the airplane scene and have always wanted to get into the scratch building segment of the field. I have found a set of plans for a Lockheed P-38 Lighting, which I would really like to build, and its got a 108" wing span and calls for twin Ryobi 31CC Engines. It seems to be a little overpowered, but like I said I.m new to the field. Looking for some advice on the subject.
The P-38 is a POOR choice. always!
No matter what your skill level is.
Its aerodynamics are bad. Verticals are too small, engines are too far out from the fuselage, the wing has too much taper.
Unless you have a LOT of twin engine experience, especially with single-engine flight, which on the P-38 is very common, and very likely to end up right where the picture shows, don't try a P-38 for a first of anything.
(This is the 2nd Ziroli P-38 this guy has put in the same trash can.)
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Greensburg,
LA
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do not know your aircraft preferences, but would suggest a Old Timer to begin with. it gets the basic building going and when complete, gives easy beginning flying skills. too many fellows try to be experts in building and flying right away. its the perfect way to say NUTS, after the 1st effort. again start with a floater-- NOT a hot rod. continue to ask and we all will help. dick
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Checotah, OK
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
thanks for all the feed back, I'll put the P-38 on the back burner for a while and look for a simpler plane to scratch on. I started a P-51 with 36" wing span, and was just kinda looking for the next step. I really like to old warbirds, but I want them to look good when I'm done, so I'll practice on some others 1st.
Thanks
Thanks
#6
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_vendor.png)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Posts: 12,425
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Starting with any scale model as a first time scratch build is often not a good idea unless it's a simpler design. And a twin P38 certainly does not qualify.
But depending on your kit building and flying history it MAY work (not the P38, just scale in general). For the P38 I think Paul has it right. Do some searches for p38's here at RCU and I think you'll find that the vast majority of them have met with disaster. I know the reading I've done indicates that.
But I have to say that if you need to ask a question like this then you probably already know the answer. Success in building and the resulting flying is usually based on small incremental steps up the skill ladder. When you doubt your own ability to cope it's probably a sign that you're trying to jump three or four rungs at once and you're setting yourself up for a big fall.
But depending on your kit building and flying history it MAY work (not the P38, just scale in general). For the P38 I think Paul has it right. Do some searches for p38's here at RCU and I think you'll find that the vast majority of them have met with disaster. I know the reading I've done indicates that.
But I have to say that if you need to ask a question like this then you probably already know the answer. Success in building and the resulting flying is usually based on small incremental steps up the skill ladder. When you doubt your own ability to cope it's probably a sign that you're trying to jump three or four rungs at once and you're setting yourself up for a big fall.