The Ultimate Sport Plane?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: León, MEXICO
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IS it?
The website for Juno RC still works and lists the Tsuanami 40 for sale. http://www.junorc.com/kits.html
Wouldn't mind having a 60 size though Hobby People have the VQ Taipan (US 60 clone?) http://www.hobbypeople.net/index.php...-arf-blue.html
Also, Tower Hobbies now carries the Phoenix Models Tiger 3 ARF (Sure looks like a clone of the CG Tiger II): http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEBHM&P=0
Bill S.
The website for Juno RC still works and lists the Tsuanami 40 for sale. http://www.junorc.com/kits.html
Wouldn't mind having a 60 size though Hobby People have the VQ Taipan (US 60 clone?) http://www.hobbypeople.net/index.php...-arf-blue.html
Also, Tower Hobbies now carries the Phoenix Models Tiger 3 ARF (Sure looks like a clone of the CG Tiger II): http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEBHM&P=0
Bill S.
#27
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am with bikerbc on this. The Carl Goldberg Tigers are fully aerobatic, but they fly as easy as any trainer. Rolling one right after take-off and climbing out inverted is a comfortable thing to do. Best part is though is that with the CG in the right place, the nose is way high on a nice slow approach which makes the prettiest landings.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: León, MEXICO
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fortunately I still have my Tsunami, and it still looks like the day of its maiden flight
, BUT... perhaps I could order one just in case... Just for curiosity, which is the current price of the kit ?
Thanks
![Wink](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Thanks
#32
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IS it?
The website for Juno RC still works and lists the Tsuanami 40 for sale. http://www.junorc.com/kits.html
Wouldn't mind having a 60 size though Hobby People have the VQ Taipan (US 60 clone?) http://www.hobbypeople.net/index.php...-arf-blue.html
Also, Tower Hobbies now carries the Phoenix Models Tiger 3 ARF (Sure looks like a clone of the CG Tiger II): http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEBHM&P=0
Bill S.
The website for Juno RC still works and lists the Tsuanami 40 for sale. http://www.junorc.com/kits.html
Wouldn't mind having a 60 size though Hobby People have the VQ Taipan (US 60 clone?) http://www.hobbypeople.net/index.php...-arf-blue.html
Also, Tower Hobbies now carries the Phoenix Models Tiger 3 ARF (Sure looks like a clone of the CG Tiger II): http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEBHM&P=0
Bill S.
#33
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The tigers can't do anymore than a stick with 3D type throws and deffinatly not above what a pulse can do yet it still flies as well and slow as a tiger so I can't put my vote in for a tiger even though I have very fond memories of my tiger II.
#35
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (1)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I picked up an e flight UMX Pitts S-1s WOW!! It flies much bigger and is now a favorite. It's small enough to fly just about anywhere and will do all the IMAC maneuvers with ease. I can fly it in the neighborhood and get a lot more stick time weekly. Being a kit builder at heart this is a nice addition to the hanger Kudos to horizon on this one.
#38
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cisne,
IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://spadworld.net/gallery/display...lbum=657&pos=7
My sport plane. Mig-7, Shown powered by OS 25 AX and Mousse can muffler. Updated to a 35 AX. Very Fast
My sport plane. Mig-7, Shown powered by OS 25 AX and Mousse can muffler. Updated to a 35 AX. Very Fast
Last edited by mustangman177; 06-30-2014 at 06:46 AM.
#41
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Burleson,
TX
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have to agrre with the fellows that like the Stik models. My all time favorite plane to fly was a Midwest Sweet Stik. The version with the flat wing. I made a few changes and it just became so much fun to fly. I changed it to a tail dragger. I hadn't rounded the leading edge enough and it would make sharp turns. So I stripped the covering at the leading edge and rounded the wood and recovered. Boy howdy what a difference that made. It had the single servo with bellcranks. One guy called them "slop enhancers". I didn't change that but I did add dihedral to the wing. After that it was the smoothest, easiest to fly plane I ever had. Sometimes I would just do touch and gos for a whole flying session because it was so easy to land. I even use to fly it under the socker goals just because I could.
I check EBay ever so often to see if I can find a kit. No luck so far.
And that MIG looks cool. I have a Spad Stik I really like to fly. Its almost as good as my old Sweet Stik. I need a little better motor on it than the LA 46 thats on it now.
I check EBay ever so often to see if I can find a kit. No luck so far.
And that MIG looks cool. I have a Spad Stik I really like to fly. Its almost as good as my old Sweet Stik. I need a little better motor on it than the LA 46 thats on it now.
#42
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the stick your talking about. It bores me and lands hot because it doesn't bleed off any speed on an approach. But its fun.
The he stick might win this unofficial contest because, tho its limited aerobaticly, most just fly so well as easy its hard for even the pulse to beat it.
The he stick might win this unofficial contest because, tho its limited aerobaticly, most just fly so well as easy its hard for even the pulse to beat it.
#43
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Burleson,
TX
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dan I am not sure why you can't slow down. Is your idle too high. Try using a slightly bigger prop with a little less pitch. Try a longer approach and and slowly feed in up elevator and when you get close the ground add a little power and then drag the plane in nose high. I have done hundreds of touch and gos and this what I do when I want to land real slow.
Last edited by ratshooter; 07-05-2014 at 07:47 PM.
#44
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its a very clean airplane. Small gear and wheels. Glides as well engine off or idle. Heavy with a pretty thin wing. Sharp leading edge, almost a laminar airfoil. I have a 40fp on it swinging a 10/5.
#45
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Burleson,
TX
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dan you describe a plane that sure doesn't sound like the sweet stik I had. I have never heard anyone say the wing was thin. Most remark on the usual 18% thick airfoil that has lots of lift and slows down nicely for landing. The one I built had a sharp leading edge. Cutting back the covering and rounding the leading edge sure made it fly smoother. Now any plane I build has a nice rounded leading edge.
I have a scratch built sweet stik that because of the heavy wood Lone Star balsa sent and my over bracing of the wing weighs 6.75 pounds. Three quarters pound heavier than it should. But even with a 23oz wing loading it still takes off in just a few feet and lands as slow as the GP Big Stik 40 that weighs at least a pound lighter and has more wing area.
This plane has a ST 40 on it. It will climb at about a 70 degree angle till it is out of sight.
Can you post a pic of your plane?
I have a scratch built sweet stik that because of the heavy wood Lone Star balsa sent and my over bracing of the wing weighs 6.75 pounds. Three quarters pound heavier than it should. But even with a 23oz wing loading it still takes off in just a few feet and lands as slow as the GP Big Stik 40 that weighs at least a pound lighter and has more wing area.
This plane has a ST 40 on it. It will climb at about a 70 degree angle till it is out of sight.
Can you post a pic of your plane?
#46
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Burleson,
TX
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also I would have replied to your post sooner except I haven't been able to log in for a day and a half. I don't know whats going on here but it sure is aggrevating to have to fight to get on this site.
#47
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dan you describe a plane that sure doesn't sound like the sweet stik I had. I have never heard anyone say the wing was thin. Most remark on the usual 18% thick airfoil that has lots of lift and slows down nicely for landing. The one I built had a sharp leading edge. Cutting back the covering and rounding the leading edge sure made it fly smoother. Now any plane I build has a nice rounded leading edge.
I have a scratch built sweet stik that because of the heavy wood Lone Star balsa sent and my over bracing of the wing weighs 6.75 pounds. Three quarters pound heavier than it should. But even with a 23oz wing loading it still takes off in just a few feet and lands as slow as the GP Big Stik 40 that weighs at least a pound lighter and has more wing area.
This plane has a ST 40 on it. It will climb at about a 70 degree angle till it is out of sight.
Can you post a pic of your plane?
I have a scratch built sweet stik that because of the heavy wood Lone Star balsa sent and my over bracing of the wing weighs 6.75 pounds. Three quarters pound heavier than it should. But even with a 23oz wing loading it still takes off in just a few feet and lands as slow as the GP Big Stik 40 that weighs at least a pound lighter and has more wing area.
This plane has a ST 40 on it. It will climb at about a 70 degree angle till it is out of sight.
Can you post a pic of your plane?
Bob
Last edited by sensei; 07-07-2014 at 03:20 AM.
#48
![](/forum/images/badges/trading_plus_member.png)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Burleson,
TX
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have thought about building another just because that one flew so well. Also the Sig Senioritas I built were a lot of fun. I had a no name pattern plane that was great in the wind. Better keep the speed up though. When it quit flying it just quit.
There was a guy at the field a year ago that had scratch built a Tower Trainer 60. I am sure that was a Bridi designed plane. He flew it in some kind of pattern events and it looked just about as good as a full blown pattern plane. I have a Bridi Krafty 60 in my attic that wants me to put it together. It calls to me all the time.
The 4* 40 I had was also fun. I just didn't like that if you tried to turn using rudder it would tuck under. I use lots of rudder and have ever since I built a BUSA Cub about 1980. That plane refused to turn without rudder. But boy howdy was it fun to fly.
Last edited by ratshooter; 07-07-2014 at 05:10 PM.
#49
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is no rule that you must have a fully aerobatic airplane to perform aerobatics, any airplane with enough power, enough setup effort, enough control throw, and the most important thing is enough practice with can be your ultimate sport plane.
Bob
Bob
Last edited by sensei; 07-08-2014 at 02:35 AM.