TWIRP (Twin Plastic)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: cincinnati, OH,
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have just completed the intitial trail flights of a twin made in the Spad fashion. Coroplast and PVC downspout. I had been reluctant to go to multi engines because of the 'one engine out' repair time and costs. The spad construction method removed this problem. It is 6 ft span, two TT 46 Pros, twin rudders (Balsa), wieght 11 lb, wing loading 25 oz/ft2.
The first flight went without a hitch and I felt completely comfortable knowing that any heavy arrival would be easy to fix. during the second flight I lost the left engine. I didn't notice any violent reaction just some loss of hieght. I cut power and floated in.
If any y'all would like to try multi engines but like me was worried about the 'fixin' then I would recommend you try the plastic route.
There are a few construction pics on my page http://geocities.com/wisebrit
The first flight went without a hitch and I felt completely comfortable knowing that any heavy arrival would be easy to fix. during the second flight I lost the left engine. I didn't notice any violent reaction just some loss of hieght. I cut power and floated in.
If any y'all would like to try multi engines but like me was worried about the 'fixin' then I would recommend you try the plastic route.
There are a few construction pics on my page http://geocities.com/wisebrit
#4
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (13)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That was a neat and inexpensive twin...nice, very nice.
Did you cut a foam wing...? If you did cut a foam wing, what airfoil did you use ?
Keep us posted, and let me know how it flies...it's ugly as sin, but like the ugly sticks of old grow on you.
Soft landings always,
Bobby of Maui
Did you cut a foam wing...? If you did cut a foam wing, what airfoil did you use ?
Keep us posted, and let me know how it flies...it's ugly as sin, but like the ugly sticks of old grow on you.
Soft landings always,
Bobby of Maui
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: cincinnati, OH,
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Upperking
Certainly a four banger is a possibility. Unfortunately I don't have 4 of the same engines. I have in mind however to put a third (an old OS 60 H or maybe one of my other redundant engines) in the center of this one after I get bored flying on two.
Bob Paris
I hot wire a short length of foam then cut into two inch wide strips to make thick ribs. This allowed the use the thinner 2 mm Coroplast to skin it. Saves quite a bit of weight over the 4 mm stuff. The airfoil is flat bottom, 14" chord, quite thin at only 1 1/4", (a yardstick), and like all my designs the shape is LAR (Looks About Right ). The pics on my page may be clearer than my explaination here.
It's a ugly as sin but its airframe cost is only about $30 and I could build another in about a day - so losing an engine doesn't scare me any more. It is held together with bolts and set screws so any part is easily replacable.
From my experience with other planes made like this, I dont expect much, or any dammage, even in a very hard 'arrival'. These plastic monstrosities are as tough as old boots. They need to be with the rough treatment they get from my student pilots.
Certainly a four banger is a possibility. Unfortunately I don't have 4 of the same engines. I have in mind however to put a third (an old OS 60 H or maybe one of my other redundant engines) in the center of this one after I get bored flying on two.
Bob Paris
I hot wire a short length of foam then cut into two inch wide strips to make thick ribs. This allowed the use the thinner 2 mm Coroplast to skin it. Saves quite a bit of weight over the 4 mm stuff. The airfoil is flat bottom, 14" chord, quite thin at only 1 1/4", (a yardstick), and like all my designs the shape is LAR (Looks About Right ). The pics on my page may be clearer than my explaination here.
It's a ugly as sin but its airframe cost is only about $30 and I could build another in about a day - so losing an engine doesn't scare me any more. It is held together with bolts and set screws so any part is easily replacable.
From my experience with other planes made like this, I dont expect much, or any dammage, even in a very hard 'arrival'. These plastic monstrosities are as tough as old boots. They need to be with the rough treatment they get from my student pilots.